مقایسه کارایی باکتری های محرک رشد و کود شیمیایی در بهبود رشد و عملکرد گیاه گندم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

امروزه استفاده بی‎رویه از کودهای شیمیایی در زمین‎های کشاورزی به دلیل نگرانی‏های زیست محیطی مورد بحث است، بنابراین یافتن راهکارهای جایگزین برای کاهش اثرات مضر فعالیت‎های کشاورزی حائز اهمیت است. هدف از این تحقیق، بررسی پتانسیل جدایه‏های فراریشه‏ای و درون‏رست جداسازی شده از ریشه گیاه گندم به منظور بررسی ویژگی‏های محرک رشد و اثر آن‌ها بر شاخص‎های رشد گیاه گندم و کاهش مصرف کودهای شیمیایی فسفر بود. به این منظور ابتدا باکتری‎ها از نظر تولید هورمون ایندول استیک اسید در محیط کشت حاوی ال-تریپتوفان غربال‎گری شدند و توانایی آن‏ها در انحلال فسفات‌های نامحلول معدنی و آلی ارزیابی شد. در ادامه توانایی این باکتری‎ها در بهبود رشد گیاه گندم در یک آزمایش گلخانه‎ای در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. جدایه‎های فراریشه‏ای R185 و درون‎رست E240 به‎ترتیب با تولید 2/299 و 1/330 میکرو‎گرم بر میلی‎لیتر فسفر و همچنین تولید 2/19 و 22 میکروگرم بر میلی‎لیتر هورمون ایندول استیک اسید به عنوان جدایه‎هایی با توان انحلال فسفات‎های نامحلول و مولد ایندول استیک اسید انتخاب شدند. نتایج حاصل از تعیین توالی 16S rRNA نشان داد که جدایه‏های باکتریایی فراریشه‏ای (R185) و درون‏رست (E240) از جنس Pseudomonas بودند. به استناد نتایج حاصله، مایه‏کوبی تلفیقی با باکتری‏های فراریشه‏ای و درون‎رست موجب افزایش 6/55 درصدی در مقدار فسفر گیاه شد در حالی‎که این مقدار در مورد مایه‏کوبی جداگانه با باکتری‏های فراریشه‏ای و درون‎رست به‏ترتیب 6/35 و 4/36 درصد بود. در ارتباط با ارقام گندم، رقم روشن نسبت به رقم مرودشت درصد فسفر بالاتر (7/4 درصد) و بیومس ریشه بیشتری (2/14 درصد) تولید کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria and Chemical Fertilizers on Improving Growth and Yield of Wheat

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somayeh Emami
  • Hossein Ali Alikhani
  • Ahmad Ali Pourbabaee
  • Hassan Etesami
  • Fereydoon Sarmadian
  • Babak Motesharezadeh

university of tehran

چکیده [English]

Currently, the excessive application of chemical fertilizers in agriculture field is under debate due to environmental concerns. Therefore, it is important to find the alternative strategies to reduce harmful effects of farming practices. Aims of the research was to investigate the potential of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial isolates isolated from the roots of wheat plant in terms of plant growth promoting (PGP) traits and study their effect on the wheat plant growth indices and decreased phosphorus (P) fertilizer use. To this end, the isolated bacteria were first screened for the production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in the presence of tryptophan in the culture medium, and then the bacteria were tested for their ability to dissolve inorganic and organic phosphates. Then, the ability of these bacteria to improve wheat plant growth was conducted in a completely randomized design under greenhouse condition. Rhizospheric isolate R185 and endophyte isolate E240 produced 299.2 and 330.1 μg / ml P respectively and also produced 19.2 and 22 μg / ml IAA, respectively. 16S rRNA sequencing showed that these bacterial isolates were Pseudomonas. The results obtained from pot assay showed that the combined use of the strains caused a significant increase in wheat growth and nutritional indices (an increase of 55.6% in the amount of plant P) compared to their single application (35.6 and 36.4% increase in plant P content by R185 and E240, respectively). Among the cultivars evaluated, Roshan cultivar had a higher percentage of P (4.7%) and biomass (14.2%) than Marvdasht cultivar.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rhizospheric and endophyte bacteria
  • chemical fertilizer
  • wheat
  • biofertilizer
  • plant growth promoting traits
Alikhani, H., Etesami, H. & Mohammadi, L. (2018). Evaluation of the Effect of Rhizospheric and Non-Rhizospheric phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria on Improving the Growth Indices of Wheat under Salinity and Drought Stress. Journal of Sol Biology, 6(1), 1-14.
Alikhani, H., Saleh-Rastin, N., & Antoun, H. (2007). Phosphate solubilization activity of rhizobia native to Iranian soils. First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate Solubilization, 35-41.
Babu, S. V., Triveni, S., Reddy, R. S., & Sathyanarayana, J. (2017). Screening of Maize Rhizosperic Phosphate Solubilizing Isolates for Plant Growth Promoting Characteristics. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(10), 2090-2101.
Batool, S., & Iqbal, A. (2018). Phosphate Solubilizing Rhizobacteria as Alternative of Chemical Fertilizer for Growth and Yield of Triticum aestivum (Var. Galaxy 2013). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(7), 1400-1410.
Bread Wheat Improvement and Production. Rome, Italy: FAO: Plant Production and Protection Series.
Bric, J. M., Bostock, R. M., & Silverstone, S. E. (1991). Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57(2), 535-538.
Chen, L., Shi, H., Heng, J., Wang, D., & Bian, K. (2019). Antimicrobial, plant growth-promoting and genomic properties of the peanut endophyte Bacillus velezensis LDO2. Microbiological Research, 218, 41-48.
Curtis, B. C., Rajaram, S., & Gómez, M. (2002). Bread Wheat Improvement and Production. Rome, Italy: FAO: Plant Production and Protection Series.
Delfim, J., Schoebitz, M., Paulino, L., Hirzel, J., & Zagal, E. (2018). Phosphorus availability in wheat, in volcanic soils inoculated with phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus thuringiensis. Sustainability, 10(1), 144.
Emami, S., Alikhani, H. A., Pourbabaei, A. A., Etesami, H., Motashare Zadeh, B., & Sarmadian, F. (2018). Improved growth and nutrient acquisition of wheat genotypes in phosphorus deficient soils by plant growth-promoting rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 64(6), 719-727.
Gopalakrishnan, S., Sathya, A., Vijayabharathi, R., Varshney, R. K., Gowda, C. L., & Krishnamurthy, L. (2015). Plant growth promoting rhizobia: challenges and opportunities. 3 Biotech, 5(4), 355-377.
Gouda, S., Kerry, R. G., Das, G., Paramithiotis, S., Shin, H.-S., & Patra, J. K. (2018). Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiological Research, 206, 131-140.
Kasim, W. A., Osman, M. E., Omar, M. N., El-Daim, I. A. A., Bejai, S., & Meijer, J. (2013). Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 32(1), 122-130.
Korir, H., Mungai, N. W., Thuita, M., Hamba, Y., & Masso, C. (2017). Co-inoculation effect of rhizobia and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on common bean growth in a low phosphorus soil. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 141-150.
Ova, E. A., Kutman, U. B., Ozturk, L., & Cakmak, I. (2015). High phosphorus supply reduced zinc concentration of wheat in native soil but not in autoclaved soil or nutrient solution. Plant and Soil, 393(1-2), 147-162.
Rajaee, S., Alikhani, H., & Raiesi, F. (2007). Effect of plant growth promoting potentials of Azotobacter chroococcum native strains on growth, yield and uptake of nutrients in wheat. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 11(41), 285-297.
Ramteke, L., Sahayam, A., Ghosh, A., Rambabu, U., Reddy, M., Popat, K., & Ghosh, P. (2018). Study of fluoride content in some commercial phosphate fertilizers. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 210, 149-155.
Rana, A., Kabi, S. R., Verma, S., Adak, A., Pal, M., Shivay, Y. S., & Nain, L. (2015). Prospecting plant growth promoting bacteria and cyanobacteria as options for enrichment of macro-and micronutrients in grains in rice–wheat cropping sequence. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 1(1), 1-16.
Ribeiro, V. P., Marriel, I. E., Sousa, S. M. d., Lana, U. G. d. P., Mattos, B. B., Oliveira, C. A. d., & Gomes, E. A. (2018). Endophytic Bacillus strains enhance pearl millet growth and nutrient uptake under low-P. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 49, 40-46.
Sambrook, J., Russell, D. W., & Russell, D. W. (2001). Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (3-volume set). Immunol, 49, 895-909.
Schwyn, B., & Neilands, J. (1987). Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Analytical Biochemistry, 160(1), 47-56.
Sharma, S. B., Sayyed, R. Z., Trivedi, M. H., & Gobi, T. A. (2013). Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springer Plus, 2(1), 587.
Singh, S., Raju, N. J., & Nazneen, S. (2015). Environmental risk of heavy metal pollution and contamination sources using multivariate analysis in the soils of Varanasi environs, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(6), 1-12.
Sparks, D.L. (1996). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods, Soil Science Society of American, Inc. American Society of Agronomy, Inc, Madison Wisconsin, USA.
Sperber, J. I. (1958). The incidence of apatite-solubilizing organisms in the rhizosphere and soil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(6), 778-781.
Syers, J. K., Johnston, A. E., & Curtin, D. (2008). Efficiency of soil and fertilizer phosphorus use—reconciling changing concepts of soil phosphorus behaviour with agronomic information. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 18. FAO, United Nations, Rome.
Westerman, R. L. (1990) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Third Edition. Madison, Wisconsin; Soil Science Society of America.