نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی

بررسی اثر پویایی‌های نهادی در پایداری محیط‌زیستی با واسطه‌گری مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی سازمانی: تحلیل کمی در منطقة تکاب استان آذربایجان غربی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مرتعداری، دانشکدة منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، نور، ایران.

2 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

10.22059/jne.2025.404565.2850

چکیده

در این پژوهش، اثر رفتار تعاملی کنشگران نهادی بر پایداری محیط‌زیستی با نقش میانجی مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی سازمانی در چارچوب یک سیستم اجتماعی-اکولوژیک مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی سازمانی به‌عنوان تعهد نهادها نسبت به پیامدهای تصمیمات خود بر جامعه و محیط‌زیست، در تعامل با پویایی نهادی معنا می‌یابد و می‌تواند مسیر دستیابی به پایداری را هموار سازد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی-تحلیلی با رویکرد کمی بوده و با بهره‌گیری از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار SmartPLS انجام شد. جامعة آماری شامل عوامل سازمانی فعال در سازمان‌های دولتی و معادن شهرستان تکاب در استان آذربایجان غربی بود. در مرحلة نخست، معیارها و روابط میان آنها در قالب یک مدل مفهومی شناسایی و سپس فرضیه‌های تحقیق آزمون شد. نتایج نشان داد که پویایی نهادی اثر مثبت و معنی‌داری بر مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی سازمانی (0/541=β)؛ (12/325=T) و پایداری محیط‌زیستی (0/384=β)؛ (5/932=T) دارد. این نتیجه نشان می‌دهد که اعتماد و مشارکت نهادی می‌تواند به‌طور مستقیم تعهد سازمان‌ها به مسئولیت اجتماعی را تقویت کند. همچنین، مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی سازمانی نیز تأثیر مثبت و معنی‌داری بر پایداری محیط‌زیستی (0/418=β)؛ (6/866=T) داشته و نقش میانجی آن در رابطة بین پویایی نهادی و پایداری محیط‌زیستی از نوع جزئی و با شدت متوسط ارزیابی شد. براساس این یافته‌ها، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که ارتقاء پویایی نهادی و تقویت مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی در سازمان‌ها، به‌ویژه در حوزه‌های دولتی و صنعتی، می‌تواند به بهبود عملکرد ‌محیط‌زیستی و افزایش پایداری در سطح منطقه‌ای منجر شود. با این حال، این عوامل به‌تنهایی برای تحقق توسعة پایدار کافی نبوده و نیازمند تکمیل با سایر مؤلفه‌های ساختاری و مدیریتی هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the impact of institutional dynamics on environmental sustainability through the mediating role of organizational social responsibility: A quantitative analysis in Takab region, West Azerbaijan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saba Goli 1
  • Iman Islami 1
  • Masoud Bijani 2

1 Department of Rangeland Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Noor Iran.

2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran.

چکیده [English]

This study examines the influence of interactive behavior among institutional actors on environmental sustainability, mediated by organizational social responsibility, within the framework of a socio-ecological system. Organizational social responsibility is conceptualized as the commitment of institutions to the societal and environmental consequences of their decisions, and its effectiveness is shaped through interaction with institutional dynamics. The research is applied in nature and employs a descriptive–analytical method with a quantitative approach, utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM) and SmartPLS software for data analysis. The statistical population includes organizational actors operating in governmental institutions and active mining enterprises in Takab County, located in West Azerbaijan Province. Initially, relevant criteria and their interrelationships were identified and structured into a conceptual model, followed by hypothesis testing. The results revealed that institutional dynamics have a positive and significant effect on organizational social responsibility (β= 0.541; t= 12.325) and environmental sustainability (β= 0.384; t= 5.932). This result suggests that institutional trust and participation can directly strengthen organizations' commitment to social responsibility. Furthermore, organizational social responsibility also exerts a positive and significant influence on environmental sustainability (β= 0.418; t= 6.866), with its mediating role in the relationship between institutional dynamics and environmental sustainability assessed as partial and of moderate strength. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that enhancing institutional dynamics and strengthening organizational social responsibility, particularly within governmental and industrial sectors, can improve environmental performance and promote sustainability at the regional level. However, these factors alone are not sufficient to achieve comprehensive sustainable development and must be complemented by other structural and managerial components.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mediating role
  • Policy evaluation
  • Socio-ecological system
  • Structural equation modeling
Abugre, J.B., Nyuur, R.B., 2015. Organizations’ commitment to and communication of CSR activities: insights from Ghana. Social Responsibility Journal 11(1), 161-178.
Adu, D.A., 2022. Competition and bank risk-taking in Sub-Saharan Africa countries. SN Business & Economics 2(7), 80.
Adu, D.A., Roni, N.N., 2024. Bank climate change initiatives, ownership structures, and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence from emerging economies. Business Strategy and the Environment 33(4), 3039-3077.
Afsar, B., Maqsoom, A., Shahjehan, A., Afridi, S.A., Nawaz, A., Fazliani, H., 2020. Responsible leadership and employee's proenvironmental behavior: The role of organizational commitment, green shared vision, and internal environmental locus of control. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(1), 297-312.
Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., Majid, A., Yasir, M., 2020. Does corporate social responsibility commitment and participation predict environmental and social performance? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(6), 2578-2587.
Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G.M., Adams, M., Walker, T.R., 2020. Understanding the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical underpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Sustainability 12(3), 760.‏
Azadkhani, P., Hosseinzadeh, J., Karami, F., 2018. Investigating the role of social capital in environmental protection in Ilam city. Environmental Science and Technology Quarterly 22(9), 1-16. (In Persian)
Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M., 2005. Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33(4), 461-475.
Beaudoin, C.A., Cianci, A.M., Hannah, S.T., Tsakumis, G.T., 2019. Bolstering managers’ resistance to temptation via the firm’s commitment to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 157(2), 303-318.
Chen, C.M., Delmas, M., 2011. Measuring corporate social performance: An efficiency perspective. Production and Operations Management 20(6), 789-804.
Chuang, S.P., Huang, S.J., 2018. The effect of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental performance and business competitiveness: The mediation of green information technology capital. Journal of Business Ethics 150(4), 991-1009.
Collier, J., Esteban, R., 2007. Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business ethics: A European Review 16(1), 19-33.
Dare, J., 2016. Will the truth set us free? An exploration of CSR motive and commitment. Business and Society Review 121(1), 85-122.
Ding, H., Wang, Z., 2025. The Influence of Institutional Pressures on Environmental, Social, and Governance Responsibility Fulfillment: Insights from Chinese Listed Firms. Sustainability 17(9), 3982.‏
Goes, H.A.D.A., Fatima, G., Santos Jhunior, R.D.O., Boaventura, J.M.G., 2023. Managing for stakeholders towards corporate environmental sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30(4), 1561-1572.
Goli, S., Islami, I., Bijani, M., Azadi, H., 2025. Modeling the role of institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility in enhancing natural resource governance: A social capital-based approach. Natural Resource Governance 2(1). (In Persian)
Gong, G., Deng, Q., Gong, X., Liu, W., Ren, Q. 2018. A new double flexible job-shop scheduling problem integrating processing time, green production, and human factor indicators. Journal of cleaner production 174, 560-576.
Green Jr, K.W., Zelbst, P.J., Bhadauria, V.S., Meacham, J., 2012. Do environmental collaboration and monitoring enhance organizational performance?. Industrial Management & Data Systems 112(2), 186-205.
Hajarian, A., 2022. Analysis of barriers and challenges in rangeland management: Case study of Kermanshah province rangelands. Watershed Management Research Journal 13(26), 125-134. (In Persian)
Harness, D., Ranaweera, C., Karjaluoto, H., Jayawardhena, C., 2018. The role of negative and positive forms of power in supporting CSR alignment and commitment between large firms and SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management 75, 17-30.
Hart, B., Walker, G., Katupitiya, A., Doolan, J., 2020. Salinity management in the murray–darling Basin, Australia. Water 12(6), 1829.
Hoffmann, E., 2007. Consumer integration in sustainable product development. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(5), 322-338.
Khan, A., Li, C., Shahzad, M., Sampene, A.K., 2023. Green effectual orientations to shape environmental performance through green innovation and environmental management initiatives under the influence of CSR commitment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(1), 2205-2217.
Kotler, P., Lee, N., 2008. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. John Wiley & Sons.
Mahdavi, D., Sajadi Qeydari, H., Mahmoudi, H., 2019. Analyzing environmental attitudes and behavior of nomadic communities after implementing participatory forest and rangeland management plan: Case study of Bazoft district, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Geography and Environmental Planning 30(2), 135-156. (In Persian)
Meyer, J.P., Herscovitch, L., 2001. Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review 11(3), 299-326.
Osagie, E.R., Wesselink, R., Blok, V., Lans, T., Mulder, M., 2016. Individual competencies for corporate social responsibility: A literature and practice perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 135(2), 233-252.
Ringle, C., Da Silva, D., Bido, D., 2015. Structural equation modeling with the SmartPLS. Bido, D., da Silva, D., Ringle, C., 2014. Structural Equation Modeling with the Smartpls. Brazilian Journal of Marketing 13(2).
Savari, M., Eskandari Damaneh, H., Avazpour, L., 2019. Developing sustainable rangeland exploitation strategies among local communities: Case study of Kerman County. Rangeland 13(2), 319-336. (In Persian)
Seroka-Stolka, O., 2014. The development of green logistics for implementation sustainable development strategy in companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 151, 302-309.
Sultan, H., Rahman, S.U., Munir, F., Ali, A., Younas, S., Khan, H., 2025. Institutional dynamics, innovation, and environmental outcomes: a panel NARDL analysis of BRICS nations. Environment, Development and Sustainability 1-43.‏
Thakadu, O.T., 2005. Success factors in community based natural resources management in northern Botswana: Lessons from practice. In Natural resources forum 29(3), 199-212). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
UNEP., 2019. We’re gobbling up the Earth’s resources at an unsustainable rate. Retrieved February 20, 2023 from https:// www.unep. org/ news- and- stori es/ story/ were- gobbl ing- earths- resources- unsus tainable- rate.
Watson, R.T., Boudreau, M.C., Chen, A., Huber, M., 2008. Green IS: Building sustainable business practices. Information Systems 17, 17.
Yung, W.K., Chan, H.K., So, J.H., Wong, D.W., Choi, A.C., Yue, T.M., 2011. A life-cycle assessment for eco-redesign of a consumer electronic product. Journal of Engineering Design 22(2), 69-85.
نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی
دوره 78، شماره 4
دی 1404
صفحه 615-628