تدوین راهبرد مدیریتی به کمک روش نوین ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری و مدل DPSIR در بوم‌سازگان تالابی (مطالعة تالاب امیرکلایه لاهیجان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه محیط‌زیست، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران.

10.22059/jne.2024.380449.2703

چکیده

تغییرات دو دهة اخیر تالاب امیر‌کلایه تأثیرات مهمی بر ساختار و کارکرد آن تالاب گذاشته است. بر همین اساس، در این پژوهش به ارائة برنامة راهبردی توسعة حفاظت محیط­زیست تالاب امیرکلایه با استفاده از مدل DPSIR پرداخته شده است. پس از ارزیابی آسیب­ پذیری ارزش ­های تالاب نسبت به تهدیدهای منطقه، راهبردهای مدیریتی تعیین گردید. برای رسیدن به این امر پس از بازدید میدانی، مصاحبه با کارشناسان و تکمیل پرسشنامه توسط متخصصین، نیروهای محرکه، فشار، وضعیت، اثر و پاسخ محیط، شناسایی شدند. سپس در قالب جدول­های ماتریس ارزیابی ارزش ­ها نمره­ دهی و وزن ­دهی گردید و براساس چارچوب نیروهای محرکه، فشار، وضعیت، اثرات و پاسخ ­های احتمالی تجزیه و تحلیل گردید. براساس نتایج حاصل در تالاب امیرکلایه 5 نیروی محرکة اصلی، 14 عامل فشار، 15 عامل وضعیت، 7 عامل اثر و 11 عامل پاسخ شناسایی گردید. بیش­ترین تأثیرات تهدیدات در ارزش­ های اکولوژیک بر پرندگان تالابی و کم­ترین تأثیرات تهدیدات بر گیاهان خشک ­زی است. در حیطة ارزش هیدرولوژیکی، بیش­ترین تهدید در کاهش کیفیت و کدورت آب و کم­ترین تهدید در نگه‌داشت آب در دورة کم­ آبی تالاب است. در حیطة ارزش ­های اقتصادی بیش­ترین تهدید در ورود پساب کشاورزی و صید بی­ رویه و کم­ترین تأثیر در زنبورداری است، همچنین کاهش کارکرد منطقة شکار و صید ممنوع تالاب از نظر اجتماعی مهم­ترین اثر آسیب­ پذیری را داراست. نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش را می­ توان مبنایی برای اولویت ­بندی فعالیت ­های مدیریتی تالاب امیرکلایه دانست. همچنین روش ارزیابی آسیب­ پذیری و چارچوب DPSIR مورد استفاده در این تحقیق می ­تواند به درک روابط میان عملکردهای تالاب و خدمات حاصل از آنها کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Develop of the management strategies using the new vulnerability assessment method and DPSIR model in wetland ecosystems (case study: Lahijan Amirkalaye wetland

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sheyda Rostamifar
  • Seyedeh Soolmaz Dashti

Department of Environment, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Biodiversity provides various ecosystem services to human societies and addresses human needs, but human interventions have caused biodiversity loss and reduced ecosystem services. The designation of protected areas is a strategy to manage environmental crises and biodiversity loss, but these areas are under threat. This research analyzes the factors affecting biodiversity loss in protected areas using a quantitative methodology (descriptive-correlational). Data were collected through structured interviews, using a questionnaire, with 250 out of 5095 rural households of the local communities of the Sorkhabad Protected Area of the Zanjan Province. The sample size was calculated using the Cochran sampling formula and was randomly selected through the multi-stage sampling technique. The questionnaire was developed by the research team and its questions’ content and face validities were assessed and verified by an expert panel in this field. The reliability of the research instrument was also confirmed by conducting a pilot study and applying Cronbach’s alpha test. The results showed that the biodiversity loss is determined by the variables of local community participation, interventions by external organizations, human drivers related to local communities, the livelihood, motivation, and knowledge of local communities, attitudes towards biodiversity conservation, knowledge about biodiversity degradation, knowledge about biodiversity challenges, and knowledge about ecosystem services, which explained 68 percent of biodiversity loss variance. Therefore, it is necessary for decision-makers and policy-makers to pay attention to relevant and effective factors in reducing the loss of biodiversity in order to conserve and restore ecosystems and species in protected areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Amirkalaye
  • DPSIR
  • Management strategies
  • Vulnerability assessment
Abedi, T., Hosseini, M., 2021. Investigating the level of knowledge and public awareness of local community stakeholders in line with the objectives of the SIPA program (case study: Amirkalaye Lahijan lagoon, Gilan province). Rural Development Strategies Quarterly 8(2), 245-262. (In Persian)
Abedi, T., Jensi, Z., 2020. Investigating the factors affecting wetland degradation according to the decision support criteria of SIPA with fuzzy Delphi approach (Case study: Amirkalaye wetland, Gilan Province). Environmental Science Studies 5(2), 2589-2596. (In Persian)
Atkins, J.P., Burdon, D., Elliott, M., Gregory, A.J., 2011. Management of the marine environment: Integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62(2), 215-226.
Baheri, B., Dashti, S., 2022. Vulnerability assessment of Golestan national park for sustainable development using DPSIR model. Journal of Natural Environment 75(1), 22-37. (In Persian)
Ballut-Dajud, G.A., Sandoval Herazo, L.C., Fernández-Lambert, G., Marín-Muñiz, J.L., López Méndez, M.C., Betanzo-Torres, E.A., 2022. Factors affecting wetland loss: A Review. Land 11, 434-452.
Brunhara, J., Macedo, K., Tapas, D., Innocentini, M., 2023. A driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) tool to help waste pickers’ cooperatives self-evaluate their environmental and economic performance. Hygiene and Environmental Health Advances 6, 100054
Carnohan, S.A., Trier, X., Liu, S., Clausen, L.P.W., Clifford-Holmes, J.K., Hansen, S.F., Benini, L., McKnight, U.S., 2023. Next generation application of DPSIR for sustainable policy implementation. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability 5, 100201.
Dashti, S., Karimipoor, F., 2023. Environmental hazard assessment of Gomishan International wetland using conceptual framework DPSIR and TOPSIS. Journal of Natural Environment 75(5), 46-63. (In Persian)
Du, W., Liao, X., Tong, Z., Rina,S., Rong,G., Zhang,J., Liu, X., Guo, E., 2023. Early warning and scenario simulation of ecological security based on DPSIRM model and Bayesian network: A case study of east Liaohe river in Jilin Province. China,  Journal of Cleaner Production 160, 136649
Dube, Th., Dube, T., Marambanyika, T., 2023. A review of wetland vulnerability assessment and monitoring in semi-arid environments of sub-Saharan Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 132,  103473.
Erraj Chahid, N., Bouchkara, M., Canu, D.M., El Khalidi, K., Zourarah, B., 2023. Assessing the dynamics of the Moulay Bousselham lagoon: An integrated DPSIR approach to understand drivers. Impacts and Human Response 87, 31-48.
Gol Mohammad, A., Shariati, F., 2016. Investigating the trophy of Amirkalaye wetland in Gilan province using the TSI index. Wetland Ecobiology Quarterly 8(30), 63-72. (In Persian)
Haddad, R., Ebrahim Banihabib, M., Hashemy Shahdany, S.M., Javadi, S, Najafi, S., 2021.Supplying environmental water of Gavkhoni wetland by improving agricultural water demand management. Ecohydrology 8(2), 345-355. (In Persian)
Hamidi, H., 2022. The application of the DPSIR conceptual model and the MCDM technique in the development and ranking of management strategies for the protection of wetlands, a case study: Horul Azim wetland. Dissertation for Master's Degree, Islamic Azad University of Ahvaz, pp. 1-120.
Hayward, J., Jackson, M., Yost, Ch., Truelstrup HansencRo, L., Jamieson, R., 2018. Fate of antibiotic resistance genes in two Arctic tundra wetlands impacted by municipal wastewater. Science of the Total Environment 642, 1415-1428.
He, G., Fu, Y., Zhao, Sh., 2023. Evaluation of water ecological security in Huaihe River Basin based on the DPSIR-EES-SMI-P model. Water Supply 23(3), 1127–1143.
Hou, X., Lv, T., Xu, J., Deng, X., Liu, F., Lam, J., Zhang, Z., Han, X.,2023.  Evaluation of urban public transport sustainability in China based on the driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework: A case study of 36 major cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 103, 107263.
Hou, M., Li, L., Yu,H., Jin, R., Zhu , W., 2024. Ecological security evaluation of wetlands n Changbai Mountain area based on DPSIRM model. Ecological Indicators 160, 111773.
Jafari, Sh., Arazzadeh, Y., 2012. Compilation of strategic management factors for Anzali wetland with SWOT method. Wetland Ecobiology 3(10), 46 -37. (In Persian)
Jahanishakib, F., Malekmohamadi, B., Yusefi, E., Alipour, M., 2017. Developing management strategies using a new method for vulnerability assessment of wetland ecosystems (Case study: Choghakhor wetland). Environmental Science and Technology 19(5), 377-391. (In Persian)
Jiang, W., Lv, J., Wang, C., Chen, Zh., Liu, Y., 2017. Marsh wetland degradation risk assessment and change analysis: A case study in the Zoige Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators 82, 316-326
Karmakar, S., Islam, S.S., Sen, K., Ghosh, S., Midya, S., 2023. Climate Crisis and Wetland Ecosystem Sustainability. In: Chatterjee, U., Shaw, R., Kumar, S., Raj, A.D., Das, S. (eds) Climate crisis: Adaptive approaches and sustainability. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham, pp. 529-549.
Khoshnoudi Khorshtami, B., Mahdinejad, N., 2016. Investigating the climatic conditions of Amirkalaye Lahijan wetland. The Second National Conference on Urban Planning, Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environment, pp. 1-15. (In Persian)
Kianpour, H., Dashti, S., Behbash, R., 2023. Vulnerability assessment of Miangaran wetland ecosystem. Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards 9(1), 41-56. (In Persian)
Kumar Sarkar, U., Karnatak, G., Lianthuamluaia, L., Puthiyottil, M., Ghosh, B.,  Johnson, C., Kumari, S., Saha, S., Kumar Das, B., 2022.  Combining stakeholder perception and ecological pproaches for assessing vulnerability of floodplain wetlands in changing climate: a regional study.  Biometeorol 66(7), 1415-1427.
Madbari, H., Shelkohi, A., 2020. Determining the environmental water demand of Amirkalaye wetland based on a comprehensive approach, considering the conflict between water use for agriculture and wetland protection. Water Resources Research 16(3), 282-305. (In Persian)
Medbari, H., Karimi, M., Razdar, B., Kasi, A., Kazemirad, L., Jalili, K., 2022. Evaluation of the impact of different water resource management scenarios with the approach of meeting the environmental water needs of the wetland in the basin. Abriz (case study: Amirkalaye lagoon). Water and Irrigation Management 12(3), 581-601. (In Persian)
Mehdi Nesab, M., 2022. Compilation of the management strategy of the wetlands of Poldakhter city based on the DPSIR model. Journal of Environment and Transsectoral Development 6(74), 78-90. (In Persian).
Meng, W., He, M., Hu, B., Mo, X., 2017. Status of wetlands in China: A review of extent, degradation, issues and recommendations for improvement. Ocean & Coastal Management 146, 121-138.
Mirakbari, M., Ebrahimi Khusf, Z., 2020. Investigation of spatial and temporal changes in atmospheric aerosol using aerosol optical depth in Southeastern Iran. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources . Journal of Applied RS and GIS Techniques in  Natural Resource Science 11(3), 17-25.
Mohseni, F., Sabzeqabaei, Gha, M., Dashti, S., 2018. Evaluation of the management effectiveness of protected areas in the direction of sustainable development (case study of Dez, Shimbar, Karaei). Geography and Environmental Sustainability 8(28), 111-99. (In Persian)
Mostakhtmin Hosseini, H., 2015. An introduction to research methods in humanities. Monthly Social, Economic, Scientific and Cultural Work and Society 107, 55-69. (In Persian)
Mphangwe Kosamu, I., Makwinja, R., Chiziwa Kaonga, CH., Mengistou, S., Kaunda, E, Alamirew, T., Njaya, F., 2022.  Application of DPSIR and Tobit Models in assessing freshwater ecosystems: The case of lake Malombe. Malawi. Water 14(4), 619.
Müller, F., Burkhard, B., 2012. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 1(1), 26-30.
Pham, N.M., Huynh, T.L., Nasir, M.A., 2020. Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: A Malthusian view. Journal of Environmental Management 260, 110143-110155.
Rahimi Balochi, L., Malek Mohammadi, B., 2014. Environmental risks assessment of Shadgan International Wetland based on ecological performance indicators. Environment Journal 39(65), 101-112. (In Persian)
Rastgo, P., Ramezani, B., Rezaei, P., 2023. Assessing the dimensions of Gilan's vulnerability to drought with GAMA and SUM Fuzzy model, AHP. Geography Sciences 40, 23-38. (In Persian)
Rovan Bakhsh, M., Abedinzadeh, N., Haghighi, M., 2021. Environmental assessment of Amir Kalaye International Wetland by SWOT method with local ecology approach. Environmental Science Studies 6(4), 4209-4202. (In Persian)
Sadeghi Pasvisheh, R., Eurie Forio, M., Ho, L., Goethals, P., 2021. Evidence-based management of the Anzali wetland system (Northern Iran) based on innovative monitoring and modeling methods. Sustainability 13(10), 5503.
Saghazchi, F., Jafar, H.R., Adibi, M., Bagherzadeh, H., Bagherzadeh Karimi, M., Vafaei M.R., 2018. Using ecological services as an ecological index in finding appropriate tourism with land (case study of Sarkhankel Wetland Wildlife Sanctuary). Environmental Journal 44(2), 255-241. (In Persian)
Saidian, H., 2022. A comprehensive review of applied drought indicators. Comprehensive Watershed Management 2(3), 1-30. (In Persian)
Salimi, S., Almuktar, S. A. A. A. N., Scholz, M., 2021. Impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems: A critical review of experimental wetlands. Journal of Environmental Management 286, 1-15.
Sandi, S., Rodriguez, J., Wen, N., Kuczera, G., Riccardi, G., Saco, P., 2020. Resilience to drought of dryland wetlands threatened by climate change. Scientific Reports 10, 1-14.
Santos, E., Fonseca, F., Santiago, A., Rodrigues, D., 2024. Sustainability Indicators Model Applied to Waste Management in Brazil Using the DPSIR Framework. Sustainability 16, 2192.
Saravia-Maldonado, S.A., Fernández-Pozo, L.F., Ramírez-Rosario, B., Rodríguez-González, M.Á., 2024. Analysis of deforestation and water quality in the Talgua river watershed (Honduras): Ecosystem approach based on the DPSIR model. Sustainability 16(12), 5034
Shi, H., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Sun, J., Li, J., Guo, Z., Huang, J., Yu, S., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Ding, D., 2020.   Evaluation system of coastal wetland ecological vulnerability under the synergetic influence of land and sea: A case study in the Yellow River Delta. China. Marine Pollution Bulletin 52, 111- 121.
Talesh, F., Saeb, K., 2021. Assessment of contamination and origin of heavy metals in sediments, water and reed plant stem of Kiakalaye lagoon using qualitative and quantitative indicators. Natural Environment 74(1), 110-97. (In Persian)
Tscherning. K., Helming, K., Krippner, B., Sieber, S., Paloma, S.G.Y., 2012. Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making. Landuse Policy 29, 102- 110
Weißhuhn, P., Müller, F., Wiggering, H., 2018. Ecosystem vulnerability review: Proposal of an interdisciplinary ecosystem assessment approach. Environmental Management 61, 904-915.
Yang, Z.-M., Han, L.-F., Liu, Q.-P., Li, C.-H., Pan, Z.-Y., Xu, K., 2022.  Spatial and temporal changes in wetland in Dongting lake basin of China under long time series from 1990 to 2020. Sustainability 14, 3620- 3634.
Ye, S., Pei, L., He, L., Xie, L., Zhao, G., Yuan, H., Ding, X., Pei, S., Yang, S., Li, X., 2022. Wetlands in China: evolution, carbon sequestrations and services, t, and preservation/restoration. Water 14, 1152- 1171.
 Zhao, Z., Fu, B., Lü, Y.,   Li, T., Deng, L., Wang, Y., Lü, D., Wang, Y., Wu , X., 2024. Variable climatic conditions dominate decreased wetland vulnerability on the Qinghai‒Tibet Plateau: Insights from the ecosystem pattern-process-function framework. Journal of Cleaner Production 458, 142496.
دوره 77، شماره 3
آذر 1403
صفحه 413-427