نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی

بررسی نگرش ساکنین شهر کرج در ارتباط با سگ‌های ولگرد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه محیط‌ زیست، دانشکدة منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

2 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

10.22059/jne.2024.360827.2571

چکیده

سگ­ ها جزء معمول ­ترین گونه ­های مهاجم هستند که با­توجه ‌به جمعیت زیاد آن­ها در شهر­ و ایجاد تعارض با انسان، مدیریت این گونه با مشکلاتی همراه است. به‌دست‌آوردن درک صحیحی از نگرش مردم بومی از گام ­های اولیه در جهت مدیریت جمعیت این گونه است. در این مطالعه، با استفاده از پرسشنامه و از طریق مصاحبة رودررو در مدت زمان سه ماه به ارزیابی نگرش افراد ساکن در شهر کرج نسبت به سگ ­های ولگرد پرداخته شد. در مجموع ۵۰۰ پرسشنامه از طریق نمونه ­برداری به روش تصادفی ساده جمع‌آوری گردید. براساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس یک ­طرفه، افراد با سطوح مختلف تحصیلی از نظر نگرش در ارتباط با سگ­ های ولگرد نسبت به هم کاملاً مشابه هستند. همچنین نتایج آزمون تی مستقل برای بررسی تفاوت نگرش صاحبان حیوانات خانگی و افرادی که حیوان خانگی نداشتند نسبت به سگ­های ولگرد، نشان داد صاحبان حیوانات خانگی دیدگاه مثبت‌تری نسبت به سگ‌های ولگرد دارند. نتایج آزمون تی تک نمونه ­ای نشان داد باتوجه‌ به اینکه افراد معتقدند وجود سگ‌های ولگرد رفاه آنها را کاهش می‌دهد، علاقة زیادی برای حضور آنها در شهر ندارند. در نهایت باتوجه ­به یافته­‌های ‌این پژوهش توصیه می­شود اقداماتی از جمله افزایش اطلاع‌رسانی در خصوص عدم تغذیة سگ‌های ولگرد در محیط شهر از طریق رسانه‌های ارتباط‌جمعی، برقراری ارتباط با مردم در مورد اثرات منفی بوم‌شناسی سگ ­ها، برای جلب حمایت مردمی و ارائة راهکارهای مدیریت مؤثر برای کنترل جمعیت آنها بکار گرفته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the attitudes of Karaj residents towards stray dogs

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Zahra Raisi Ardali 1
  • Afshin Alizadeh Shabani 1
  • Amir Alambeigi 2
  • Zahra Ghorbanian 1

1 Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Faculty of Natural Resources University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Dogs are one of the most common invasive species, and due to their large population in the city and the creation of conflicts with humans, the management of this species is associated with problems. Obtaining a correct understanding of the native people's attitude is one of the first steps towards population management.In this study, the attitude of people living in Karaj city towards stray dogs was evaluated using a questionnaire and through face-to-face interviews for a period of three months. A total of 500 questionnaires were collected through simple random sampling. Based on the results obtained from the one-way analysis of variance test, people with different educational levels are completely similar in terms of their attitude towards stray dogs. Also, the results of the independent t-test to investigate the difference in attitude of pet owners and  people who did not have petstowards stray dogs, showed that pet owners have a more positive view towards stray dogs. The results of One Sample T-test showed considering that people believe that the presence of stray dogs reduces their well-being, they are not interested in their presence in the city. Finally, according to the findings of this research, it is recommended to take measures such as increasing information about not feeding stray dogs  in the city environment through mass communication media, communicating with people about the negative effects of dog ecology, for Attracting public support and providing effective management solutions to control their population.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Attitude
  • Environment
  • Invasive species
  • Karaj
  • Stray dogs
  • Social dimensions
Alborz Governorate, 2011. Detailed results of the 2011 population and housing census of Alborz province. (In Persian)
Bhalla, S. J., Kemmers, R., Vasques, A., Vanak, A.T., 2021. ‘Stray appetites’: a socio-ecological analysis of free-ranging dogs living alongside human communities in Bangalore, India. Urban Ecosystems 24(6), 1245-1258.
De Ruyver, C., Abatih, E., Dalla Villa, P., Peeters, E.H., Clements, J., Dufau, A., Moons, C. P., 2021. Public opinions on seven different stray cat population management scenarios in Flanders, Belgium. Research in Veterinary Science 136, 209-219.
Dechner, A., 2020. Predicting the tangible and intangible costs of co-occurring with wildlife. Global Ecology and Conservation 23, e01091.
Doherty, T.S., Glen, A.S., Nimmo, D.G., Ritchie, E.G., Dickman, C.R., 2016. Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(40), 11261-11265.
Gates, M.C., Walker, J., Zito, S., Dale, A., 2019. A survey of opinions towards dog and cat management policy issues in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 67(6), 315-322.
Ghobadi, A., Khosravi, M., Tavousi, T., 2018. Surveying of heat waves impact on the urban heat islands: Case study, the Karaj City in Iran. Urban Climate 24, 600-615.
Gompper, M.E.Ed., 2014. Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press.
Guilloux, A.G., Panachão, L.I., Alves, A.J., Zetun, C.B., Cassenote, A.J.,  Dias, R.A., 2018. Stray dogs in urban fragments: relation between population’s perception of their presence and socio-demographic factors. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 38, 89-93.
Hughes, J., Macdonald, D.W., 2013. A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation 157, 341-351.
Izaguirre, E.R.,  Montiel, D.O., 2021. Roaming the Campus: University Stakeholders’ Perceptions of, and Interactions with, Campus Cats and Dogs. Anthrozoös 34(3), 423-439.
Lord, L. K., 2008. Attitudes toward and perceptions of free-roaming cats among individuals living in Ohio. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 232(8), 1159-1167.
Loyd, K.A.T.,  Miller, C.A., 2010. Influence of demographics, experience and value orientations on preferences for lethal management of feral cats. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15(4), 262-273.
Management and planning organization of Alborz province., 2016. Detailed results of the 2015 population and housing census of Alborz province. (In Persian)
Manfredo, M.J., Vaske, J.J.,  Decker, D.J., 1995. Human dimensions of wildlife management: Basic concepts. Wildlife and recreationists: Coexistence through Management and Research 17-31.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Development., 2007. Strategic program and structural plan (comprehensive) of Shahr Karaj. (In Persian)
Mohammadi, A., Nayeri, D., Alambeigi, A., Marchini, S., 2022. A wicked environmental challenge: collaboration network for free-ranging dog management in an urban environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1-12.
Nayeri, D., Mohammadi, A., Qashqaei, A.T., Vanak, A.T., Gompper, M.E., 2022. Free-ranging dogs as a potential threat to Iranian mammals. Oryx 56(3), 383-389.
Nayeri, Daniel., 2019. Stray Dogs; Challenges and solutions. Delta (2), 52-55. (In Persian)
Phillips, R.B., Winchell, C.S.,  Schmidt, R.H., 2007. Dietary overlap of an alien and native carnivore on San Clemente Island, California. Journal of Mammalogy 88(1), 173-180.
Rahimian, Ashraf., 2016. Investigating the effect of urban branding strategies on the image of the city from the perspective of female citizens (study: Karaj). International Conference on Women and Urban Life. (In Persian)
Rand, J., Fisher, G., Lamb, K.,  Hayward, A., 2019. Public opinions on strategies for managing stray cats and predictors of opposition to trap-neuter and return in Brisbane, Australia. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 5, 290.
Ristea, A. M. 2013. Dynamic analysis for the management of stray dogs in Bucharest. Cinq Continents 3(7), 73-87.
Sakieh, Y., Amiri, B. J., Danekar, A., Feghhi, J.,  Dezhkam, S., 2015. Simulating urban expansion and scenario prediction using a cellular automata urban growth model, SLEUTH, through a case study of Karaj City, Iran. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment  30(4), 591-611.
Sampson, W.W., 1984. The Urban Canine: Pet... Disease Vector... Safety Hazard... Nuisance. Journal of Environmental Health pp. 306-310.
Schulz, F., Engel, M.T., Bath, A.J., Oliveira, L.R., O’Neal, C., 2017. Human-Wildlife Interaction: The Case of Big Cats in Brazil. Biological Conservation in the 21st Century: a conservation biology of large wildlife. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York. pp. 31-57.
Sedaqat. S., 2017. Iranology - Alborz attractions. Tehran: Three hundred and sixty degree publications. (In Persian)
Silva-Rodríguez, E.A., Cortés, E.I., Zambrano, B., Naughton-Treves, L., Farías, A.A., 2023. On the causes and consequences of the free-roaming dog problem in southern Chile. Science of The Total Environment 891, 164324.
Smith, L.M., Quinnell, R., Munteanu, A., Hartmann, S., Dalla Villa, P., Collins, L., 2022. Attitudes towards free-roaming dogs and dog ownership practices in Bulgaria, Italy, and Ukraine. PloS one 17(3), e0252368.
Toukhsati, S.R., Bennett, P.C., Coleman, G.J., 2007. Behaviors and attitudes towards semi-owned cats. Anthrozoös 20(2), 131-142.
Uetake, K., Yamada, S., Yano, M., Tanaka, T., 2014. A survey of attitudes of local citizens of a residential area toward urban stray cats in Japan. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 17(2), 172-177.
van Eeden, L.M., Newsome, T.M., Crowther, M S., Dickman, C.R., Bruskotter, J., 2020. Diverse public perceptions of species' status and management align with conflicting conservation frameworks. Biological Conservation 242, 108416.
Weng, Y., McShea, W., Diao, Y., Yang, H., Zhang, X., Gu, B., Wang, F., 2022. The incursion of free-ranging dogs into protected areas: A spatio-temporal analysis in a network of giant panda reserves. Biological Conservation 265, 109423.
Young, J.K., Olson, K.A., Reading, R.P., Amgalanbaatar, S.,  Berger, J., 2011. Is wildlife going to the dogs? Impacts of feral and free-roaming dogs on wildlife populations. BioScience 61(2), 125-132.
نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی
دوره 77، ویژه نامه بوم شناسی و مدیریت تنوع زیستی
مرداد 1403
صفحه 105-114