برآورد بارش مؤثر به روش حل معکوس در اراضی تحت کشت گندم دیم و مقایسة آن با روش‌های تجربی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه علوم و مهندسی آب، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، کرج، ایران.

10.22059/jne.2023.356951.2539

چکیده

در این پژوهش باران مؤثر در اراضی تحت کشت گندم دیم استان کرمانشاه به روش حل معکوس برآورد گردیده و نتایج حاصل از آن با روش­های تجربی برآورد باران مؤثر ( USDA، FAO، درصدی و تجربی) مقایسه و خطای نسبی آن­ها برآورد شده است. با توجه به نیاز به داده­های هواشناسی و عملکرد محصول گندم دیم، از داده­های هواشناسی استان کرمانشاه که شامل 10 ایستگاه هواشناسی بوده و همچنین از اطلاعات میزان تولید و سطح زیرکشت موجود در سالنامه­های زراعی برای محصول گندم دیم برای 14 سال زراعی استفاده شد. ابتدا بارش مؤثر به کمک انواع روش­های مورد اشارة تجربی محاسبه و همچنین تبخیر تعرق واقعی محصول گندم دیم با استفاده از توابع عملکرد در محدودة مطالعاتی محاسبه و در نتیجه مقدار بارش مؤثر برآورد گردید. سپس روش­های برآورد بارش مؤثر به‌صورت تجربی و حل معکوس مقایسه شدند. نتایج  نشان داد که روش درصدی با میانگین خطای نسبی 25/9 درصد کمترین خطا و روش FAO با میانگین خطای نسبی 47/78 درصد بیشترین خطا را نسبت به روش حل معکوس داشتند. با توجه به اینکه، روش ­های تجربی برآورد بارش مؤثر نسبت به روش حل معکوس مقدار خطای قابل توجهی داشته به توسعة مدل مناسبی از برآورد بارش مؤثر پرداخته شد؛ بدین‌منظور، منحنی بر 12 سری از داده­های بارش-بارش مؤثر برازش داده شد و 2 سری از داده­ ها برای صحت­سنجی بکار گرفته شدند. خطای داده­ های اعتبارسنجی تابع با معیار خطای RMSE ارزیابی شد. مقدار RMSE برای داده ­های اعتبار‌سنجی 4/61 میلی‌متر محاسبه شد. سپس، روش­ های تجربی برآورد بارش مؤثر و روش تابع فیت شده مورد مقایسه قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که مدل پیشنهاد شده در این پژوهش با میانگین خطای نسبی 1/07 درصد قادر است با دقت بیشتری میزان بارش مؤثر را در استان کرمانشاه نسبت به روش­ های تجربی دیگر برآورد کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Estimation of effective rainfall in the method of inverse problem solving in wheat-cultured fields and its comparison with experimental methods

نویسندگان [English]

  • Soheila Mohtashami
  • Abdolmajid Liaghat

Department of Irrigation Engineering, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

چکیده [English]

In this study, effective rainfall in wheat - cultivated areas of kermanshah province has been estimated as an inverse solution method and the results are estimated using the experimental method of effective rainfall (USDA, FAO, percentage and experimental)and their relative error is estimated. According to the need for meteorological data and the performance of caltivated dry farming wheat crop, kermanshah province's meteorological data, which consisted of 10 meteorological stations and also increased production data and the area sown to wheat crop for caltivated dry farming wheat crop for 14 years. First, effective rainfall was calculated with the help of different methods of computation and also the actual evapotranspiration of caltivated dry farming wheat using functions in the study area was calculated and therefore, the amount of precipitation was estimated. Then, the effective rainfall estimation methods are experimentally compared. The results expressed that during the last 14 years, the amount of effective rainfall estimated according to the inverse solution method during the period of caltivated dry farming wheat crop growth ranges from 119.85 to 279.90 mm. The results showed that the average error of the experimental method in the estimation of effective rainfall was significantly higher than the reverse solution method and the percentage method with average error margin of 25.9 % and FAO method with mean relative error rate of 47.78% had the highest error compared to the reverse solution method. Due to the fact that the experimental methods of effective rainfall estimation have a significant amount of error compared to the inverse solution method, a suitable model of effective rainfall estimation was developed. The results showed that the model proposed in this research, with an average relative error of 1.07%, is able to more accurately estimate the amount of effective precipitation in Kermanshah province than other experimental methods.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • CROPWAT
  • Effective rainfall
  • Experimental methods
  • Inverse solving
Abedinpour, M., 2016. Determination of Wheat Growth, Crop Coefficient (KC) and Water Stress Coefficient (Ks) under Different Salinity. Preprints 2016, 2016110091.
Adnan, Sh., Hayat Khan, A., 2008. Effective rainfall for irrigated agriculture plains of Pakistan. Pakistan. Journal of Meteorology 6, 6172.
Alizadeh, A., 1988. Principles of applied hydrology, 11th edition, Astan Quds Razavi Publications, p 156. (In Persian)
Andarzian, B., Bannayan, M., Stedutoc, P., Mazraeha, H., Baratid, M.E., Baratie, M.A., Rahnamaa A., 2011. Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran. Agricultural Water Management 100, 1-8.
Asadzade Shorfe, H., Raoof, M., Mahmoodifard Garmi, Z., 2015. The best method of calculation in Ardabil plain. The second national conference on protection of natural resources and environment, Ardabil. (In Persian)
Ayu, I.W., Sebayang, H.T., Soemarno, P.S., 2018.  Assessment  of  Rice  Water Requirement  by  Using  CROPWAT  Model  in Sumbawa  Regency,  West  Nusa  Tenggara, Indonesia. VEGETOS: An International Journal of Plant Research 31(2).
Azizi, Gh., 2000. Estimation of effective rainfall in relation to dry wheat cultivation (Case: Khorram Abad). Geographical Research 32(39), 123-115. (In Persian)
Doorenbos, J., Kassam, A.H., 1979. Yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 33. FAO, Rome.
Han, N., Lou, G., Wang, Y., Zhou, Q., Jin,G., Li, S., Ye, L., 2019. Calculation of Effective Rainfall in the Spring Maize Growing Period. HAL Science 143-151.
Hasheminasab, F, S., Mousavi Baygi, M., Bakhtiari, B., Bannayan, M., 2014. The Effects of Rainfall on Dryland Wheat Yield and Water Requirement Satisfaction Index at Different Time Scales. Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering 17(5), 1-13. (In Persian)
Khaleghi, N., 2015. Comparision of effective rainfall estimation methods in agriculture. Water and Sustainable Development 2(2), 51-58. (In Persian)
Khoshal Dastjerdi, J., Joshani, A, R., 2012. Estimating the most appropriate method of calculating effective rainfall for autumn wheat cultivation in the Namak lake area. Geographical studies of dry areas 3(9-10): 153-169. (In Persian)
Kolaeyan, A., Gholami Sefidkoohi, M.A., 2012. Introducing the best method of determining the effective rainfall of rice cultivation in Qaemshahr city. The third National Comprehensive Resource Management Conference, Sari, Iran. (In Persian)
Lashkari, H., Keykhosravi, GH. & Rezae, A., 2009. Analysis of the effectiveness of the CROPWAT model in estimating the water requirement of wheat crops in the west of Kermanshah: the cities of Islamabad Gharb, Sarpol Zahab and Ravansar. Human Sciences MODARES 1(60), 248-270. (In Persian)
Mojarad, F. and Nasiri, Sh., 2006. The results of return periods and safe intervals for conducting experiments for rice cultivation in Mazandaran Plain. Human Sciences MODARES 10(2), 160-181. (In Persian)
Mozafari, Gh. and Ghaemi, H., 2002. Analysis of implementation conditions at the level of studied rainfed areas: East of Kermanshah. Physical Geography Research 34(42), 119-103. (In Persian)
Pourgholam Amiji, M., Hooshmand, M., Raja, O., Liaghat, A., 2019. Effective Rain Zoning In Khuzestan Province under Autumn Rainfed Wheat Cultivation. Water and Irrigation Management 9(2), 211-230. (In Persian)
Rahimi, J., Bazrafshan, J., Khalili, A., 2013. A Comparative Study on Empirical Methods for Estimating Effective Rainfall for Rainfed Wheat Crop in Different Climates of Iran 45(3), 31-46. (In Persian)
Rahman M.M., Islam M.O., Hasanuzzaman M., 2008. Study of effective rainfall for irrigated agriculture in South-Eastern part of Bangladesh. World Journal of Agricultural Science 4(4), 453-457. (In Persian)
Saeidi, R., Ramezani Etedali, H., Sotoodehnia, A., kaviani, A., Nazari, B., 2018. Determination of the Relationships between Yield and Evapotranspiration of Maize under Salinity Stress and Nitrogen Deficiency Conditions. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 32(3), 351-366. (In Persian)