<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Natural Environment</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-7764</Issn>
				<Volume>77</Volume>
				<Issue>Ecology and Biodiversity Management</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of the performance of the linear and non-linear models in habitat suitability estimation (case study: Razi scraper, Capoeta razii)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparison of the performance of the linear and non-linear models in habitat suitability estimation (case study: Razi scraper, &lt;i&gt;Capoeta razii&lt;/i&gt;)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>49</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>60</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">95191</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jne.2023.367109.2610</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hadi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Poorbagher</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Soheil</FirstName>
					<LastName>Eagderi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Fateh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Moezzi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The statistical models with the best performance in habitat suitability studies of fish species are of high importance. The present study compared the performance of linear (linear regression model (LM) and generalized linear model (GLM)) and non-linear models (artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM)) in estimating habitat suitability index (HSI) for &lt;em&gt;Capoeta razii&lt;/em&gt; in a southern Caspian Sea basin. The environmental parameters were altitude, depth, width, velocity, temperature, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), bottom stone diameter, and total count of stones with diameter &gt; 15 cm per m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. The linear models had weak predictive performance (higher RMSE values) compared to ANN and SVM models. The SVM was the best model with the predictors of altitude, pH, temperature, and stone diameter, and ANN was the best model using the rest of the parameters. The arithmetic mean model (AMM) showed better performance in estimating HSI compared to the geometric mean model (GMM). The distribution of HSI values along the sampling stations in the Caspian Sea basin (the Taleghan River) showed high diversity in the habitat condition of the fish species.     </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The statistical models with the best performance in habitat suitability studies of fish species are of high importance. The present study compared the performance of linear (linear regression model (LM) and generalized linear model (GLM)) and non-linear models (artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM)) in estimating habitat suitability index (HSI) for &lt;em&gt;Capoeta razii&lt;/em&gt; in a southern Caspian Sea basin. The environmental parameters were altitude, depth, width, velocity, temperature, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), bottom stone diameter, and total count of stones with diameter &gt; 15 cm per m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. The linear models had weak predictive performance (higher RMSE values) compared to ANN and SVM models. The SVM was the best model with the predictors of altitude, pH, temperature, and stone diameter, and ANN was the best model using the rest of the parameters. The arithmetic mean model (AMM) showed better performance in estimating HSI compared to the geometric mean model (GMM). The distribution of HSI values along the sampling stations in the Caspian Sea basin (the Taleghan River) showed high diversity in the habitat condition of the fish species.     </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Habitat variables</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">modelling</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Species Distribution</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Taleghan River</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jne.ut.ac.ir/article_95191_fe4a91f8d04f4fa9843c6ad06dcbfb19.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
